July 18, 2009

Tweets for 2009-07-18

  • Another iPhone app rejection (valid this time but not a crash as they claim). Re-submitted and still have seven apps in the review queue. #
  • The Palm SDK might not be as powerful as iPhone's but if their store and approval process is better, I'm certainly going to consider it. #
  • Installing VirtualBox to try out the Palm Pre SDK. Honestly, given how Apple has been behaving towards devs, I'd switch if it's viable. #
  • Why does every platform have to invent their own terminology? On the Pre, it's models, views, and assistants as opposed to controllers 🙂 #
Tags:
Posted by Fahim at 1:00 pm  |  No Comments

July 17, 2009

Tweets for 2009-07-17

  • The new Sir Insult-a-lot Lite got rejected but the update to the paid version wasn't even checked. I pulled it anyway and replaced the file. #
Tags:
Posted by Fahim at 1:00 pm  |  No Comments

July 16, 2009

Tweets for 2009-07-16

  • Really bad migraine today. So haven't done much work. But then again, have been working hard the last week or so. The break's good 🙂 #
  • Watching "Leverage" season 2 opener right now. It's just as good as ever! Hopefully, the new season will continue the good form … #
  • "Warehouse 13" sounds good as a premise. Will have to watch a couple of episodes to see if it's worth following … #
Tags:
Posted by Fahim at 1:00 pm  |  No Comments

July 15, 2009

Tweets for 2009-07-15

  • iPhone 3.1 beta 2 is out and Twitter will probably go crazy with people repeating this bit of info and re-hashing the old "What's new" posts #
Tags:
Posted by Fahim at 1:00 pm  |  No Comments

July 14, 2009

Tweets for 2009-07-14

  • Craigslist iPhone post: "You can share half the dough with us–and you've seen and heard just how quickly those app sales can add up." 😀 #
Tags:
Posted by Fahim at 1:00 pm  |  No Comments

July 13, 2009

Tweets for 2009-07-13

  • My iPhone apps "Door Bells" and the Lite version have a bug when the phone number is more than 10 digits. Fix being submitted. Apologies. #
  • I now have six (soon to be seven) apps in the review queue with Apple! At this rate my waiting apps will outnumber the published ones 😀 #
  • I loathe people who follow you and then unfollow as soon as you've followed in return. It's a small joy to track them down and unfollow 😀 #
Tags:
Posted by Fahim at 1:00 pm  |  No Comments

July 11, 2009

Tweets for 2009-07-11

  • Still waiting on that app that Apple said needs "unexpected additional time for review". Not sure why they need 2weeks for a 6 screen app. #
  • Hmm …. iTunes Connect now allows you to upload PNG images for screenshots? When did that happen? #
Tags:
Posted by Fahim at 1:00 pm  |  No Comments

July 7, 2009

The Wrath of Apple?

A couple of weeks back, I came across a few apps on the Apple app store which had what I thought was a neat concept – a mini-app store, or rather, a list of applications provided by the same company. Since Apple had approved these apps and they were in the Apple app store, I figured that I might as well implement the feature in my own apps that I did from then on.

I was mindful of the fact that Apple has strict guidelines (sometimes unstated ones :p) and so didn’t want to infringe any of these. However, in this case I thought I might be on solid ground since there were several other apps on the app store which already implemented the feature. I was even careful enough to do things pretty similar to how it was done by these other apps so that I wouldn’t infringe upon some unstated guideline.

So imagine my surprise when I submitted my app and almost immediately received a rejection stating:

“Thank you for submitting WordOne and WordOneLite to the App Store. We’ve reviewed WordOne and WordOneLite and determined that we cannot post this version of your iPhone application to the App Store because your applications contains pricing information in the binary and/or marketing text (Application Description / Release Notes). Providing specific pricing information in these locations may lead to user confusion because of pricing differences in countries. It would be appropriate to remove pricing information from these locations.”

Now I read elsewhere (later) that Apple indeed objects to pricing information being included in the app because they say that it will confuse users. And I can understand this. However, I had done that only because the other apps available on the app store already did this too. But I didn’t want to go through a protracted session of debating with Apple and so simply changed my application to remove the pricing information and resubmitted it.

However, I did want to know what the actual guidelines were. So I responded to Apple and asked them for a clarification on their guidelines because they already had apps on the app store which included pricing information (only in one currency mind you) in them and those had been approved. I even provided a few examples.

That might have been a mistake 😀

Because today I received not one but two responses from Apple. The first one was a reply to my question about clarifying the position on why my app was rejected while they approved other apps with pricing information. It simply said:

“Thank you for your email. Unfortunately we are unable to provide addition information at this time. Thank you for uploading a new binary. We will notify you if there are any further issues.”

So no information. Apple will do as Apple pleases. No surprises there 🙂 But the second e-mail, sent a few hours later was the dreaded, “Your application is meeting unexpected delays” one. Specifically, it said:

“Your application, WordOne and WordOneLite, are requiring unexpected additional time for review. We apologize for the delay, and will update you with further status as soon as we are able.”

Now I don’t know for a fact that my application was delayed because I questioned Apple about their decision. But on the other hand, the timing seems a little suspicious to me. I’ve never received an app review in any time longer than seven days before. Every time before, for about seven apps, I would get an update, regular as clockwork, on the seventh day. If it was rejected, and I fixed the issue, I wouldn’t hear back from Apple again till seven days had passed.

For my eight or ninth app, the delay went from seven days to nine days but that was around the height of WWDC and the release of OS 3.0. For these two specific apps, I got my first rejection in about four days and then the second notification about “unexpected delays” came three days or so after I questioned the process and right on the heels of their other response. So forgive me if I find the timing a little too pat 🙂

So what’ll happen to my app? I have no idea. I have heard of other developers who have had apps sit in the review queue for months without hearing anything back from Apple at all. Maybe that’s what’ll happen to WordOne and WordOne Lite. I don’t know. But I hope that this won’t be the case and the delay is genuine and my apps will see the light of day within the next week, especially given stupid release like this that Apple seems to let through without any thought at all. I can always hope, can’t I? 🙂

Tags: , ,
Posted by Fahim at 7:58 am  |  1 Comment

July 6, 2009

Tweets for 2009-07-06

  • Got up earlier than usual. Have to travel today. But hope to be back at the computer before end of the day. But who knows? 🙂 #
Tags:
Posted by Fahim at 1:00 pm  |  No Comments

July 4, 2009

Tweets for 2009-07-04

  • The big thing today on Twitter for iPhones appears to be re-tweeting this article about iPhone application sharing via simulator. #
  • It's interesting that quite a few Android vs. iPhone articles are written by Android fans who complain about how hard Objective-C is 🙂 #
  • "Royal Pains" has definite potential as a show after watching the pilot 🙂 Looking forward to the next few episodes – McGyver doctor! #
Tags:
Posted by Fahim at 1:00 pm  |  No Comments

« Previous PageNext Page »